Category: Science

  • Origin Of The Universe Theories – From Static Universe To Big Bang

    Origin Of The Universe Theories – From Static Universe To Big Bang

    In the 1960s, there was a heated debate going on between two opposing cosmological theories, which tried to explain the origin of the universe – the Big Bang theory and the Steady State theory. But before either of these theories existed, people believed in the static universe theory.

    The static universe theory

    They believed that the universe was neither expanding nor contracting. It had always existed the same way forever and was infinite in space and time. But Isaac Newton’s discovery of gravity in the seventeenth century challenged this belief.

    Isaac Newton’s law of gravitation

    Newton discovered that every body in this universe attracts every other body in the universe. The force with which two bodies attract each other is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. 

    To understand the impact of Newton’s theory on the static model of the universe, consider doing an experiment. Take a stone and throw it up towards the sky. Initially, the stone is at rest on your hand. Hence, the speed with which the stone is pulled down (negative velocity) due to gravitational acceleration is zero. So, at the moment you throw the stone, the speed with which you throw the stone, directed upwards (positive velocity), will be greater than the speed with which gravity pulls it, directed downwards. Therefore, the stone goes upwards.

    But as the stone goes up, the velocity of the stone decreases due to the gravitational acceleration pulling it down. At one point in time, the stone stands still in the sky. At this instant, the force of gravity would have completely canceled out the force of the throw. After this instant, the stone starts moving downwards, with its speed increasing every second.

    Thus, at any point, the stone is either moving up or moving down. It does not stay static, except for only one instant. But even this one instant is not a stable state, meaning that the stone cannot stay there for a long time. 

    Now, if you throw the stone up with a greater force, it goes higher up but eventually comes down. If you throw the stone with an extremely large force (more than 11km/s), it will keep going up. It will eventually escape the earth’s atmosphere and never return.

    If you extend this concept to astronomical bodies, then one can understand that any two objects will either constantly move towards each other or away from each other. They cannot stay at a constant distance from each other indefinitely. Thus, Newton’s law of gravity challenged the notion of a static universe significantly.

    Newton himself was also aware of the consequences of his theory. But he believed that God had placed the astronomical bodies like stars in perfect numbers and distances from each other. So, the gravitational forces exerted on each astronomical body by all the other astronomical bodies are canceled out. Hence, even though they were unstable, the stars remained in balance, just like a needle balanced on a single point. Thus, the entire universe managed to remain static for an infinite time.

    Newton’s law of gravitation was a huge step for mankind. But it did have its flaws. For starters, even Newton didn’t understand how gravity could act without a medium. Moreover, there were some astronomical occurrences that his law of gravitation couldn’t explain. Yet, despite its flaws, it was widely accepted for a very long time.

    But two hundred years later, a physicist called Albert Einstein disproved Newton’s law of gravitation and postulated his own theory explaining gravity called the theory of general relativity.

    Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity

    Albert Einstein postulated that space, time, and mass were related. So, any object with mass warps, bends, or stretches the space and time around it. This warping action is the cause of all gravity. You would understand this if you have seen the movie Interstellar, where time runs faster when the hero nears a black hole. Because of its extreme mass, the black hole accelerates time when passing near it.

    To understand this phenomenon, imagine two people standing opposite each other, each holding one of the two opposite edges of a big sheet. If these two people move away from each other, then the sheet will get outstretched up until the point when the entire sheet lies on a single plane. Now, if a third person drops a football in the middle of the sheet, you can imagine what would happen. The sheet would be pulled downwards, with the amount of pull greater in the middle and decreasing towards the edges. The heavier the football, the higher the force with which it pulls the sheet down. Now, if you drop a small object, maybe a tennis ball, on any location on the sheet, it would eventually move towards the middle, where the football is.

    Now think of the sheet as the spacetime and the football as a star. Just like in the experiment above, the star would bend/warp the spacetime around it due to its mass. The heavier the star, the greater its bending/warping will be. And any other object in the vicinity will be pulled towards it, thus creating the effect of gravity. 

    Theory of general relativity for the origin of the universe theories

    Source – www.theperihelioneffect.com​

    At this point, you may be wondering what has Einstein’s theory of general relativity got to do with the origin of the universe. Actually, it has got a lot to do with the universe and its origin.

    According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, a massive object stretches the spacetime around it. And when light travels through this spacetime, it ends up getting stretched too. As it travels through this stretched spacetime more and more, it gets stretched more and more. As a result, its wavelength increases, and the light becomes red in color since red has the longest wavelength. This phenomenon is called cosmological redshift.

    The big bang theory

    Einstein’s theory of general relativity made a huge impact on the scientific community. It changed many people’s understanding of the universe. One of those people was a Belgian priest called Georges Lemaître. Since he was a kid, Lemaître had had an interest in finding out how things around him worked.

    In 1915, when Einstein published his theory of general relativity, impressed by it, Lemaître started studying it. In 1927, he deduced that if Einstein’s theory was true, then the universe was not static; it was expanding in all directions. But he did not have any data to prove this. So, not many people believed in his theory. Even Einstein, who was a firm believer of the static universe, did not endorse Lemaître’s interpretation of his theory. 

    Edwin Hubble

    Until 1919, the common perception was that our milky way galaxy was the only galaxy in the entire universe. But in 1919, while investigating the night sky using the Hooker telescope, the largest telescope at that time, Edwin Hubble found that several dust clouds, which were previously considered part of the milky way galaxy, were actually much, much farther away. Hence, he argued that they couldn’t be part of the milky way galaxy. They could only be entire galaxies, which were very far away. Thus, Hubble showed that the universe was made up of many galaxies, not just our own galaxy.

    In 1929, unaware that Lemaître had proposed a theory of an expanding universe based on Einstein’s theory of general relativity, Hubble made a remarkable discovery. At that time, Hubble was investigating the cosmological redshift from various galaxies. He discovered that the amount of redshift in the light from a galaxy was proportional to its distance from earth. This indicated that other galaxies were moving away from us. Moreover, the speed with which a galaxy was moving away from us was proportional to its distance from earth, i.e., the farther a galaxy was, the faster it was moving away. These findings led him to take the only possible logical deduction – The universe was expanding. Even though this is the same conclusion Lemaître had arrived at two years earlier, Hubble was credited for discovering that the universe was expanding.

    The Hypothesis of the Primeval atom

    But Lemaître used Hubble’s findings to propose something that faced strict opposition initially. He proposed that since the universe was expanding, it would have been smaller in the past. So, if we went back in time, long, long ago, the universe would have been an extremely dense but tiny object. Lemaître called this tiny object the Primeval atom. As it was extremely dense, at some point, the Primeval atom would have exploded suddenly. This explosion created space, time, and expansion, which continues to this day.

    Lemaître’s theory had a profound impact on the way people viewed the universe. Moreover, it gave rise to philosophical questions, like, if the universe did begin with an explosion, what created the explosion in the first place. 

    Today, we call Lemaître’s theory the big bang theory. However, Lemaître did not call his theory the big bang theory. He called it the “hypothesis of the primeval atom.” The term ‘Big Bang’ was actually coined by Fred Hoyle. (Fred Hoyle is the scientist under whose supervision Stephen Hawking wanted to do his Ph.D. degree. But Hoyle declined Hawking because he already had enough students working under him.)

    Big Bang theory - One of the origin of Universe theories

    ​An illustration of how the Big Bang might have happened – By NASA/WMAP Science Team – Original version: NASA; modified by Cherkash, Public Domain, Link

    Fred Hoyle

    Fred Hoyle was one of those people who vehemently opposed the big bang theory. Indeed, he coined the term ‘Big Bang’ as a way to mock Lemaître’s theory. During an interview for BBC Radio in 1949, he said,

    These theories were based on the hypothesis that all the matter in the universe was created in one big bang at a particular time in the remote past.

    But the term he coined became famous in the 1970s and has stayed so since then.

    But it is not hard to understand why many people opposed the Big Bang theory at that time. Most people at that time believed in a static universe. So, Lemaître’s proposal that the universe had a beginning was simply not acceptable for them. Moreover, there was no evidence to back his theory. But one of the major reasons why people were not willing to believe his theory was due to his religious background.

    By claiming that the universe began from the primeval atom, Lemaître was indicating that something had somehow created the primeval atom in the first place, thus opening the possibility of the existence of a greater being. In 1952, when Pope Pious XII proclaimed that Lemaître’s theory confirmed the existence of the transcendental creator, it cemented many people’s beliefs that Lemaître’s religious beliefs were the motivation for his theory, thus reducing the credibility of this theory. Even though Lemaître affirmed that his religious background had nothing to do with his scientific theory, nobody believed him.

    So, it is no wonder that for Fred Hoyle, who was an ardent atheist, Leimatre’s theory appeared unbelievable. Fred Hoyle instead believed in the steady-state model of the universe, which he and two other scientists had developed.

    The steady-state theory

    According to the steady-state theory, changes take place in the universe, but only on a smaller scale. When taken as a whole, however, the universe had always been the same at all times. To put it simply, the steady-state theory states that the universe doesn’t change over time.

    But Hubble showed that the universe was expanding. The steady-state theory got around this by stating that as old galaxies disappear (either due to their increasing distance from earth or because they disintegrate into neutron stars and black holes) new stars and galaxies are formed, which take up their place. Thus, on a smaller scale, the universe might appear to be expanding, but on a larger scale, the universe maintains a constant density and constant average distance between galaxies.

    So, the universe had always been the same at all times in the past. It will also continue to do so in the future. Therefore, unlike the big bang theory, which states that a creation event occurred at some time in the past, the steady-state theory states that nothing of that sort ever happened because the universe had always been the same. This is a particularly interesting aspect of the steady-state theory that appealed to believers of the static universe theory and atheists like Fred Hoyle.

    The steady-state theory enjoyed great support until the 1960s. However, in the 1960s, Quasars and Cosmic Microwave Background radiation were discovered.

    Quasars

    Quasars are incredibly bright objects in the universe. They could be a thousand times brighter than the milky way galaxy, and yet, they are very small compared to a galaxy. But Quasars are only found billions of light-years away from earth and not anywhere nearby. This means that they existed only billions of years ago, not in the present. The fact that Quasars were the birthplace of galaxies and the fact that they existed billions of years ago provided strong evidence that the universe had changed over time. This went against the core belief of steady-state theory, which believed that the universe stayed the same forever.

    Picture of two pairs of Quasars

    Two pairs of quasars that existed 10 billion years ago (taken by Hubble Space Telescope) – By ESA/Hubble, CC BY 4.0, Link

    Cosmic Microwave Background

    In 1965, two researchers working at Bell Laboratories, while trying to build a radio receiver, stumbled upon Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), a noise that came uniformly from all directions in space. Big bang theory explains CMB as the radiation that was emitted when the universe was still young. CMB radiation was emitted by the universe almost 400,000 years after the big bang happened. The universe at that time was starting to cool down from a temperature of 273 million degrees. 

    Since then, the universe has been expanding and cooling down. So, the CMB has also cooled down to a temperature of -273.15°C today. The big bang theory explained CMB as relic radiation from the time the universe was young. In other words, CMB represents the heat/radiation left from the big bang. But since no astronomical body in the present emits such radiation, steady-state theory, which believes that the universe has remained the same forever, was not able to explain the presence of CMB.

    Cosmic Microwave Background of the Night sky

    The Cosmic Microwave Background of the night sky as seen from the Planck satellite – By European Space Agency – https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2013/03/Planck_CMB, CC BY-SA 4.0, Link

    Thus, in the 1960s, due to the discovery of Quasars and CMB, the steady-state theory was disproved. Since then, the big bang theory has been widely accepted as the theory explaining the origin of the universe.

  • How Did Stephen Hawking Discover Hawking Radiation?

    How Did Stephen Hawking Discover Hawking Radiation?

    The year 1915 was a revolutionary year for modern physics. It was in this year that Albert Einstein published his theory of general relativity.

    Before that, for almost 200 years, people had considered gravity to be a mere attractive force between objects, as Newton had theorized. But Einstein’s theory of general relativity seriously challenged that notion. According to the theory of general relativity, gravity was not just an attractive force; it was the result of a massive object bending the spacetime around it.

    Albert Einstein and his field equations

    To describe the interaction of gravity due to this bending effect, Einstein published ten equations, called Einstein’s Field Equations. These equations provided a mathematical approach to gravity and hence, became the holy grail for astrophysicists.

    But despite Einstein’s equations providing a possible way to find out how gravity really works, there was one big problem. Einstein had only published the equations, not their solutions. Moreover, his equations were non-linear, and non-linear equations are difficult to solve.

    Karl Schwarzschild’s solution to Einstein’s equations

    The first person to find a solution to Einstein’s equations was Karl Schwarzschild, an accomplished mathematician, theoretical physicist, and one of Einstein’s colleagues. And by finding a solution to Einstein’s equations, he theoretically predicted the existence of mysterious objects in the universe with infinite density and incredible gravitational attraction.

    Today, we call these mysterious objects black holes and have come to accept their existence. But at the time Schwarzschild predicted the existence of black holes, most physicists disagreed. They considered black holes as mere mathematical anomalies that could not exist in reality. 

    After all, if a black hole could exist, then its strong gravitational field would not let anything, not even light traveling at 3×10^8 m/s, escape the black hole. So, for an observer outside the black hole watching an object falling into the black hole, the object would disappear suddenly. So, any information regarding that object (e.g., what happens to that object in the future?) would be lost to the outside world once it fell into the black hole. Hence, if a black hole existed, it would directly contradict the first law of thermodynamics, which states that energy (information) can neither be created nor be destroyed in an isolated system. That’s why most people at that time did not believe that a black hole could exist.

    Black holes contradict the second law of thermodynamics

    Moreover, the existence of black holes would also contradict the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy (a measure of disorderliness) of any isolated system will always increase. For example, according to the second law of thermodynamics, if you stop cleaning your room, it will only get dirtier with time. It will never become cleaner as time passes unless you put some effort into doing so. Thus, the entropy of an isolated system always increases with time.

    All objects (matter) have entropy. So, since an object disappears when dropped into a black hole, physicists assumed that its entropy would disappear too. Therefore, the total entropy of the entire universe would go down. But according to the second law of thermodynamics, this was forbidden. Hence, black holes violated the second law of thermodynamics too.

    Stephen Hawking and Jacob Bekenstein

    But Stephen Hawking, the famous theoretical physicist of the 21st century, was okay with it. He thought that if black holes really didn’t obey the second law of thermodynamics, then so be it. He believed that finding the truth about black holes was more important than being obsessed with the laws of physics.

    But Jacob Bekenstein, a graduate student from Princeton University, did not agree with Stephen Hawking.  He believed that black holes, too, must obey the second law of thermodynamics.

    Jacob Bekenstein’s idea

    In 1970, Stephen Hawking had theorized that the event horizon (boundary) of a black hole could never get smaller. If an object fell into a black hole, the black hole absorbed it, and its event horizon got bigger. So, a black hole and its event horizon only got bigger with time and never smaller.

    In 1972, Bekenstein, who had read Stephen Hawking’s theory, came up with a wild idea. Every time an object fell into a black hole, the object and its entropy disappeared, while the event horizon of the black hole got bigger. So, what if the event horizon of the black hole was actually a measure of the entropy of the black hole?

    Hawking was immediately flabbergasted by Bekenstein’s idea. He thought that it was seriously flawed. If the entropy of the black hole were to increase, it would get hotter, and with heat comes radiation. But black holes couldn’t radiate because their strong gravitational pull would never let anything escape their event horizons.

    Hawking tries to prove Bekenstein wrong

    So, when he returned to Cambridge, Hawking decided to prove Bekenstein wrong and started working on it. But contrary to his expectations, instead of proving Bekenstein wrong, he ended up discovering the mathematical relationship between a black hole’s event horizon and its entropy and confirmed that Bekenstein’s idea was indeed correct. This equation came to be known as the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy equation.

    Hawking radiation

    Combining Theory of General Relativity with Quantum physics

    Hawking now realized that a black hole’s entropy could increase with time. And when its entropy increased, the black hole would get hotter and emit radiation.

    Previously, he had only considered Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which told that nothing, not even radiation, could escape a black hole’s gravity. But he had failed to take quantum mechanics into account, which states that pairs of particles and antiparticles appear in the universe out of empty space. One of these partners (particle/antiparticle) would have positive energy, while the other would have negative energy. So, the partner with negative energy would seek out its partner with positive energy. They would then annihilate each other and disappear within a moment.

    Coming up with the idea for Hawking radiation

    Hawking proposed that if such a particle-antiparticle pair were to appear near the event horizon of a black hole, it was possible for the partner with negative energy to fall into the event horizon while the other escaped, preventing them from annihilating each other. The orphaned particle (or antiparticle) with positive energy would then travel away from the event horizon of the black hole. For an observer outside the event horizon, these escaping particles would look like radiation. Today, we call this radiation Hawking radiation. 

    Meanwhile, due to the negative energy particle (or antiparticle) which fell into the black hole, the overall energy of the black hole would reduce. And since energy is directly proportional to mass according to Einstein (E=mc^2), the mass of the black hole would reduce too. Thus, the black hole would get smaller with time and eventually disappear.

    Hawking radiation was a remarkable discovery. It completely changed the perception of people on black holes and led to the Blackhole information paradox. Yet astronomers couldn’t observe Hawking radiation through a telescope. After all, astronomers can only study massive black holes with a telescope. But the more massive a black hole is, the lower its temperature, and the more insignificant the temperature of its radiation is, making it almost impossible to observe. So, Hawking never got a Nobel prize for his discovery. But his contribution to science and theoretical physics cannot be forgotten. He will always live in our memories as one of the inspirational, brilliant theoretical physicists of the 21st century.

  • Four of Stephen Hawking’s Bets You Should Know About

    Four of Stephen Hawking’s Bets You Should Know About

    Stephen Hawking is one of the most brilliant minds of the 21st century. He is known throughout the world for his disability, his scientific brilliance, and even for his interest in acting. But Stephen Hawking also had a weird habit that most people may not be aware of. He was a fan of making wagers. Throughout his life, he made several wagers with other scientific minds over pressing scientific questions. In this blog post, I discuss some of Stephen Hawking’s bets.

    Stephen Hawking’s bets

    In the early 1970s, when people’s interest in black holes spiked, Hawking made a rather controversial scientific wager.

    1. Cygnus X-1

    At that time, the most brilliant minds in science thought that Cygnus X-1, a strong source of X-rays, was a black hole. By observing the X-rays coming from Cygnus X-1, they suspected that Cygnus X-1 and a nearby supergiant star were orbiting their common center of mass. They deducted that the material sucked in from the star might have created a hot accretion disk around Cygnus X-1, which emitted the X-rays. They inferred its minimum mass to be at least six times that of the sun. So, theoretically, the chance of Cygnus X-1 being a black hole was pretty high.

    But Stephen Hawking made a bet against another theoretical physicist, Kip Thorne, that Cygnus X-1 was not a black hole. The prize was a magazine subscription. In his book ‘The Brief History of Time,’ Stephen Hawking explains that the bet was a form of insurance policy for him. He says,

    I have done a lot of work on black holes, and it would all be wasted if it turned out that black holes do not exist. But in that case, I would have the consolation of winning my bet, which would bring me 4 years of the magazine Private Eye.

    But in 1990, more than a decade later, Stephen Hawking conceded the bet, even though scientists were still not sure if Cygnus X-1 was actually a black hole.

    2. Naked Singularity

    But losing that bet did not stop Stephen Hawking from betting again. Just one year later, he bet against Kip Thorne and his colleague John Preskill that a naked singularity cannot exist

    A singularity is a point where the variable or variables in a mathematical function become infinite. When that happens, the behavior of the function, which is normally predictable, becomes upredictable or undefined. The functions in question here are Einstein’s Field equations which represent his Theory of General Relativity. And a singularity in these equations means infinite mass and infinite curvature, i.e., in simple terms, infinite gravity.

    Such a singularity exists theoretically in every black hole. Stephen Hawking bet that such a singularity can exist only behind the event horizon of a black hole. But Thorne and Preskill bet that it was possible for a singularity to exist even without an event horizon. (The event horizon is the boundary of a black hole, beyond which nothing, not even light, can escape from the black hole).

    In 1997, Hawking conceded that bet too and reframed it as “a naked singularity cannot form under generic conditions.” This bet has still not been resolved.

    3. The Blackhole information paradox

    In 1974, Hawking proposed that black holes can emit radiation. Since this radiation is in the form of heat and independent of what fell into the black hole previously, it gave rise to the black hole information paradox.

    But before we can look at what the Blackhole information paradox is, we have to understand what information is.

    What is information?

    In Physics, one thing is very important, and that thing is determinism, i.e., when one knows the parameters of a system, it must be possible to predict how the system behaved in the past and how it will behave in the future. Regardless of whether it is a single particle, a big chemical reaction, or the whole universe, once we know its properties, physics lets us predict its past and future states.

    So, if we know everything that is to be known about a system or an object, like the number of particles it has, their positions, velocities, spins, electric charges, etc., then we can predict these particles’ behavior in the past and future. Hence, the raw information in a system (whatever we can know about it) is always preserved across time. It never gets created or destroyed; it only gets rearranged.

    But this is not so easy when it comes to black holes, at least not after Hawking discovered Hawking’s radiation.

    A black hole’s gravitational field is so strong that nothing can escape from it once inside its event horizon. So, regardless of whatever you throw inside the black hole, that object disappears. For example, if you throw a book inside a black hole, it disappears. We know what happens afterward, but we can guess that it will be stripped apart. But the book had a lot of information before being thrown into the black hole, like the number of particles it was made of, its chemical composition, etc., besides the obvious human-readable content it contained. So, what happens when the book is thrown into a black hole? If it gets stripped apart into its constituent particle, what happens to the information it earlier contained?

    Earlier I told you that when you throw something into a black hole, it disappears.

    Well…

    It’s not completely true.

    If you are an observer outside the event horizon of the black hole, and if you throw the book into the event horizon, the book just passes through it. You don’t know what happens afterward. Maybe, the information the book contained is somehow preserved in the black hole.

    But in 1974, Hawking proposed that a black hole can emit radiation in the form of heat. This in itself is not the problem. The real problem is that, because of the radiation it emits, the black hole shrinks with time and eventually disappears. But what happened to the information about all the objects that the black hole had sucked in?

    What happened to the information contained in the light, asteroids, planets, and stars it sucked in?

    What happened to the information contained in the book you threw in?

    Would the information somehow leak through Hawking’s radiation? Hawking tells us that it’s not the case. So, if the information about the book you threw into the black hole does not come out through Hawking’s radiation, and the black hole disappears, what happened to the information? Where did it go? This indeterminism about the information inside a black hole created the paradox – The black hole information paradox.

    The wager about the Blackhole information paradox

    In 1997, Stephen Hawking made a wager once again with Kip Thorne and John Preskill regarding the Blackhole information paradox.

    This time, Hawking and Thorne were on the same side. According to the Theory of General relativity, the gravitational field of a black hole is so strong that not even light can escape from it. That is, the escape velocity of a black hole (The velocity an object needs to escape from the black hole’s gravitational pull and travel to outer space) is more than the speed of light. And since nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, nothing can escape a black hole. So, the information inside cannot leak from a black hole through Hawking’s radiation. Hence, the information carried by Hawking’s radiation must be new information and not from inside the black hole. Therefore, Hawking and Thorne bet that Quantum Physics needs to be rewritten.

    On the other hand, Preskill bet that the Theory of General Relativity must be modified because Quantum Mechanics says that the information contained within the radiation emitted from black holes must somehow relate to the information that fell into the black hole at an earlier time.

    In 2003, he conceded this bet as well.

    4. Higgs Boson

    In the early 2000s, Hawking bet against a physicist called Gordon Kane that the Higgs Boson could never be found. But the particle was eventually found in 2012. Hawking, who had obviously lost the bet, hailed Peter Higgs, the person who had theorized the existence of Higgs Boson almost 48 years earlier, and told that he should be given a Nobel prize.

  • Eugenics and Social Darwinism – Was Darwin Behind These Practices?

    Eugenics and Social Darwinism – Was Darwin Behind These Practices?

    When we think of Eugenics and Social Darwinism, the person who comes to our minds immediately is Charles Darwin. Many of us believe that Charles Darwin was behind these movements. Or, to be precise, Charles Darwin’s theories were behind them.Definitions:

    Social Darwinism – The idea that believes in the ‘Survival of the fittest.’ Social Darwinists believe that people become better in society because they are the fitter individuals, i.e., the strong become rich and powerful, while the weak become poor and powerless.

    Eugenics – The practice of improving the human race by selectively breeding individuals with desirable characteristics.

    ‘Survival of the fittest’

    Most people believe that Darwin’s concept of ‘Survival of the fittest’ helped the 18th and 19th century Europeans justify their ill-treatment of the rest of the world. It provided these people a pedestal on which they could stand and think of themselves as the more fit race of the human species. Moreover, they could easily attribute their cruel behavior to the natural process of human evolution instead of acknowledging it as having learned it during their lifetime. All thanks to Charles Darwin. At least, that’s what most people think.

    Did Darwin coin the term ‘Survival of the fittest’?

    But the truth is, Charles Darwin never used the term ‘survival of the fittest’ as these people understood it. Indeed, he didn’t even coin the term.

    Initially, when Charles Darwin published his abstract, ‘On the Origin of Species,’ he had used the term ‘Natural Selection.’ He had used it to denote the process through which the natural variations occurring in some individuals give them an advantage for survival and reproduction over the other individuals in a species. After all, this process was similar to farmers and pigeon breeders, who artificially selected the individuals to breed.

    In 1864, after reading Charles Darwin’s abstract, Herbert Spencer, an English biologist, philosopher, and sociologist, coined the term ‘Survival of the fittest’ in his book ‘Principles of Biology.’

    Charles Darwin in 1868

    Charles Darwin in 1868 – By Julia Margaret Cameron – Reprinted in Charles Darwin: His Life Told in an Autobiographical Chapter, and in a Selected Series of His Published Letters, edited by Francis Darwin. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street. 1892.Scanned by User:Davepape, Public Domain, Link

    In 1866, Alfred Russel Wallace, who had independently created an evolution theory that was similar to Darwin’s evolution theory, wrote to Darwin. He argued that Darwin’s use of the term ‘Natural Selection’ might give the readers the impression that nature actively selects the organisms that get to reproduce. He recommended the use of Spencer’s term ‘survival of the fittest’ instead as it would get rid of this ambiguity. Darwin, who had never thought about it before, confessed that Wallace’s argument made sense.  

    What did Darwin think about the term ‘Survival of the fittest’?

    In the first four editions of his abstract, Darwin had used the term ‘Natural Selection.’ In his book, The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication, which Darwin published in 1868, he explains that the term ‘Survival of the fittest’ might be a better choice, at the same time revealing his reluctance to get rid of the term ‘Natural Selection.’ He writes,

    This preservation, during the battle for life, of varieties which possess any advantage in structure, constitution, or instinct, I have called Natural Selection; and Mr. Herbert Spencer has well expressed the same idea by the Survival of the Fittest. The term “natural selection” is in some respects a bad one, as it seems to imply conscious choice; but this will be disregarded after a little familiarity.

    In the fifth edition of ‘On the Origin of Species,’ published in 1869, Darwin uses the term ‘survival of the fittest’ as a synonym. He gives full credit to Spencer for this term and writes,

    I have called this principle, by which each slight variation, if useful, is preserved, by the term Natural Selection, in order to mark its relation to man’s power of selection. But the expression often used by Mr. Herbert Spencer of the Survival of the Fittest is more accurate, and is sometimes equally convenient.

    What did Darwin use this term for?

    But Darwin only intended ‘Survival of the fittest’ to refer to genetic variations that have the highest rate of reproductive output. But by using the term ‘fittest,’ Darwin did not refer to the strongest individuals in a species.

    Darwin never intended ‘survival of the fittest’ to mean that only the strongest individuals in a species can thrive, even though the literal meaning is just that. If you think about it, reproduction is the backbone of evolution, and survival is only one aspect of it. Moreover, physical fitness provides no advantage to an individual in an evolutionary sense if it doesn’t increase the individual’s chances of reproduction. So, when it comes to evolution, the ‘fittest’ individual in a species is neither the strongest one nor the fastest one, but the one that is better suited or adapted to survive and reproduce in the immediate, local environment. Hence, by putting all these together, one can understand that Darwin used the term ‘Survival of the fittest’ not to refer to the strongest individuals in a species but to the variations among individuals that produce the highest rate of reproductive output.

    Hence, the argument put forth by Social Darwinists and Eugenists that evolution favors the survival of the strongest individuals in a species is ill-founded. And the claim that Darwin himself meant that is baseless.

    Social Darwinism

    Darwin neither created the concept of Social Darwinism nor supported it. Indeed, as one could imagine, he didn’t even coin the term Darwinism. The term Darwinism was coined by the English biologist Thomas Henry Huxley in 1861 after he read Darwin’s abstract.

    Just like Darwin did not create the term Darwinism, he had nothing to do with Social Darwinism as well. Indeed, the two people who were instrumental in this movement were Herbert Spencer and Francis Galton, and not Charles Darwin.

    In 1798, an English economist called Thomas Robert Malthus wrote an essay called ‘An Essay on the Principle of Population.’ In it, he puts forth the idea that as the population of a species increases, it would eventually outgrow food production. And when that happens, the weakest individuals will start dying due to starvation. This is the essay that helped Darwin figure out how evolution happens.

    Who came up with the concept of social Darwinism?

    Like Darwin, Herbert Spencer, too, read Malthus’ essay. Several years later, he read Darwin’s theory of evolution as well. Spencer was a polymath who believed that the natural laws discovered by biologists should not be limited to biology alone. He thought that these natural laws revealed an underlying universal order.

    Hence, they could be applied to inorganic realms of life as much as to the organic realm. Therefore, the natural laws that are true in biology must also apply to other fields like human society, economy, the human mind, etc.

    So, driven by his belief and motivated by Malthus’ essay and Darwin’s theory of evolution, Spencer started creating parallels between biology and sociology.

    A portrati of Herbert Spencer for the blog post on eugennics and social Darwinism

    Herbert Spencer in 1893 – By [1]. The updated source is [2] and lists the following information: ; Source Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Public Domain, Link

    In his book called ‘The Social Organism,’ which he published in 1860, he compares human society to a biological organism. He argues that just like organisms evolve through the process of natural selection, society evolves too. As a result of this evolution, one part of the society becomes rich and powerful, while the other part of the society becomes poor and weak. And it was normal for the rich to become richer at the cost of the poor becoming poorer.

    Herbert Spencer and social Darwinism

    Spencer believed that there was no need to correct society because it evolves automatically. Competition for survival and status was an evolutionary process essential for the betterment of the human race. And even though this evolution process creates unbearable pain for many individuals, it was necessary. So, he believed that the reforms for improving the lives of the weak and the poor actually came in the way of social evolution. Hence, he was against these social reforms and believed that they should be abolished. These beliefs led him to coin the term ‘survival of the fittest’ in his book ‘Principles of Biology’ published in 1864. Thus, Spencer contributed greatly to social Darwinism.

    Many of the people who read Spencer’s books became convinced that the rich exploiting the poor was how nature meant it to be. Thus, Spencer’s views became popular, and by the end of the nineteenth century, Spencer had become one of the most influential people in Europe.

    Eugenics

    As Spencer’s concept of Social Darwinism was becoming popular in the late nineteenth century, another man came up with a more outrageous idea. That man was none other than Francis Galton, Charles Darwin’s cousin.

    Who came up with the concept of eugenics?

    Galton argued that institutions like mental asylums and welfare only helped the poor inferior people survive and reproduce at a higher rate than Britain’s superior, more-deserving wealthy class.

    He thought this went against evolution. So, he proposed to improve the quality of the human race by getting rid of the poor and the weak. He called this elimination process eugenics.

    Eugenics is taken from the Greek word eugenes which means well-born.

    A picture of Francis Galton for the blog post on eugenics and social Darwinism

    Francis Galton in the 1850s – Scanned from Karl Pearson‘s The Life, Letters, and Labors of Francis Galton., Public Domain, Link

    Eugenics becomes famous in the USA

    Even though eugenics never really got any support in England, it was a huge hit in the USA. During the 1920s and 1930s, books were published, and films were made in the USA promoting eugenics. Throughout the country, exhibitions were held, which conducted ‘better baby’ and ‘fitter family’ competitions.

    Many eugenicists believed in Lamarck’s theory of Acquired Characteristics, which stated that the behavior an organism learns during its lifetime could be passed down to its offspring. So, morality, frugality, etc., could be passed down to children. 

    Positive and negative eugenics

    Eugenicists divided eugenics into two types: positive Eugenics and negative Eugenics.

    The goal of Positive Eugenics was to encourage the reproduction of people with desirable traits.

    On the other hand, the goal of negative eugenics was to discourage/stop the reproduction of people with non-desirable traits. White people in the upper-middle-class and high-class societies were considered people with desirable traits. The traits of all the other people, like non-whites, poor, disabled, feeble-minded, widowed, criminals, and mentally unstable, became undesirable. Even among the white people, those belonging to Western and Northern European countries were considered desirable, whereas those belonging to Southern and Eastern European countries were considered undesirable.

    Eugenics in the USA

    The American Eugenics movement mostly focused on negative eugenics. And the US government actively supported it by enacting laws. These laws supported forced sterilization of the undesirables. Between the years 1907 and 1939, almost 30,000 people were sterilized against their will in the USA. Most of them were women, as women were expected to have high standards of morality to bear children. Moreover, in 1913, 29 US States prohibited mixed-race marriages because children born to parents of two different races were deemed inferior.

    If you were an undesirable living in the USA at that time, your life was pretty much doomed. To show how terrible those times were for the undesirables, we have to look at a supreme court case. In 1927, a woman of lower economic status called Carrie Buck filed a case claiming that a rich young man had raped her. But instead of investigating the case properly, the supreme court ruled her feeble-minded and sterilized her against her will. It also ruled forced sterilizations as being federally legal.

    Thus, the forced sterilizations in the USA devastated the lives of the people who were considered undesirable. But besides that, these forced sterilizations also had an added unexpected effect – They motivated an evil-minded man to take the route of destruction.

    Hitler and Eugenics

    In 1924, when Hitler was imprisoned after organizing a failed coup, he read about social Darwinism and Eugenics. Influenced by the ‘survival of the fittest’ concept of social Darwinism, he came to believe that the German master race had become weak because of the non-Aryans in Germany. So, he started forcefully sterilizing people who did not fit his pure-blooded Aryan stereotype – the Jews, Poles, Soviets, homosexuals, people with disabilities, etc. But what initially started out as a sterilization campaign soon turned into a genocide. In his book ‘Mein Kampf,’ Hilter points out the success of the American Eugenics movement. So, it’s obvious that he was at least partly motivated by it.

    Eugenics falls out of favor

    As the entire world watched Hitler’s actions with horror and disgust, eugenics started falling out of favor. Even though eugenics had started becoming irrelevant in the 1930s due to the difficulty in proving Lamarck’s theory, its association with Nazi propaganda is what that finally awakened many eugenicists. The same people who had once supported the negative eugenics movement with great vigor started calling for the end of eugenics and started promoting human rights for all citizens of the world instead. Thus, eugenics finally came to an end in the USA and many parts of Europe by the end of the second world war.

    Eugenics, now

    But sadly, eugenics hasn’t completely disappeared from this world. It is not a dead concept from the 19th century and 20th century. 

    Even in the 21st century, several countries continue to forcefully sterilize their people. 

    The research into genetics has led to the invention of Germline engineering, which can be used to alter the genes of an unborn baby. Even though it can be used to identify and treat genetic variations associated with particular diseases, it can also introduce desired variations into babies – something which can be misused by people with money to make their children genetically superior. Hence, such a process is not considered legal by law.

    Was Darwin behind social Darwinism or eugenics?

    After having read the negative impacts of social Darwinism and Eugenics, it is far easier to think that Darwin was behind these. But as pointed out before, the biggest contributor to social Darwinism was not Darwin but Spencer. And the person who invented eugenics was, again, not Darwin, but his cousin Galton.

    Darwin’s views on slavery

    Darwin was actually against the mistreatment of people who were considered inferior by the Europeans at that time. In the second chapter of his first book, ‘The Voyage of the Beagle,’ published in 1839, Darwin writes about his experience in Rio de Janeiro, in present-day-Brazil:

    While staying at this estate, I was very nearly being an eye-witness to one of those atrocious acts which can only take place in a slave country. Owing to a quarrel and a lawsuit, the owner was on the point of taking all the women and children from the male slaves, and selling them separately at the public auction at Rio. Interest, and not any feeling of compassion, prevented this act. Indeed, I do not believe the inhumanity of separating thirty families, who had lived together for many years, even occurred to the owner. Yet I will pledge myself, that in humanity and good feeling he was superior to the common run of men. It may be said there exists no limit to the blindness of interest and selfish habit.

    Here one can clearly see that Darwin was strictly against the institution of slavery. But it is not surprising, considering he descended from grandfathers who themselves fought against slavery in England. His forefathers on his mother’s side even created their own medallions that portrayed a shackled slave, with the saying, “Am I not a Man and a Brother.” So, it is understandable where Darwin gets his virtues from.

    But he also adds the sentence,

    Yet, I will pledge myself, that in humanity and good feeling he was superior to the common run of men.

    Why he adds this sentence is hard to say. It might be because this man provided Darwin with a house to stay in during his travels, and Darwin did not want to tarnish his image completely. It might also be because he was educated, had a good standing in society, and could be considered a gentleman.

    Darwin also shares another regrettable incident in this book.

    I may mention one very trifling anecdote, which at the time struck me more forcibly than any story of cruelty. I was crossing a ferry with a negro, who was uncommonly stupid. In endeavouring to make him understand, I talked loud, and made signs, in doing which I passed my hand near his face. He, I suppose, thought I was in a passion, and was going to strike him; for instantly, with a frightened look and half-shut eyes, he dropped his hands. I shall never forget my feelings of surprise, disgust, and shame, at seeing a great powerful man afraid even to ward off a blow, directed, as he thought, at his face. This man had been trained to a degradation lower than the slavery of the most helpless animal.

    Sometime later in this book, Darwin goes on to add his own feelings on leaving Brazil.

    On the 19th of August we finally left the shores of Brazil. I thank God, I shall never again visit a slave-country. To this day, if I hear a distant scream, it recalls with painful vividness my feelings, when passing a house near Pernambuco, I heard the most pitiable moans, and could not but suspect that some poor slave was being tortured, yet knew that I was as powerless as a child even to remonstrate.

    Thus, Darwin makes it clear that he was made of a different caliber than many other Europeans of that time, who believed they were superior to other people and hence, had the right to abuse them. He actually hated slavery.

    Darwin, social Darwinism and eugenics

    But one could argue that the book was published in 1839, far before social Darwinism became a powerful force. After all, in 1859, Darwin named the Abstract ‘On the Origin of Species by the Means of Natural Selection, or, the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.’ So, doesn’t the use of the term ‘Preservation of Favored Races’ suggest that he supported social Darwinism? Well, actually… No.

    Today, the term ‘Race’ is used to refer to a subset of a species. But at the time Darwin wrote the abstract, the terms Race and Species were synonymous. No difference existed between them. Therefore, Darwin wasn’t silently supporting social Darwinism, as people are led to believe nowadays. Indeed, he believed the opposite. Social Darwinism was based on the concept of competition among individuals in a species. But Darwin believed that as organisms evolved, they developed a sense of sympathy towards others. He made his beliefs public through his book, ‘The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex,’ published in 1871. In this book, he writes,

    The following proposition seems to me in a high degree probable—namely, that any animal whatever, endowed with well-marked social instincts, the parental and filial affections being here included, would inevitably acquire a moral sense or conscience, as soon as its intellectual powers had become as well, or nearly as well developed, as in man. For, firstly, the social instincts lead an animal to take pleasure in the society of its fellows, to feel a certain amount of sympathy with them, and to perform various services for them.

    As for Eugenics, Galton came up with the concept only one year after Charles Darwin’s death. Moreover, Darwin’s theory of evolution also doesn’t support social Darwinism or eugenics because Darwin used the concept of survival of the fittest purely in the biological sense of evolution. He never intended it to be applied to the social sense. So, from these pieces of evidence, I am led to believe that Darwin neither supported nor advocated social Darwinism or Eugenics. 

  • The Theories of Darwin – Absolutely Right or Terribly Wrong?

    The Theories of Darwin – Absolutely Right or Terribly Wrong?

    The year was 1836. Charles Darwin had just returned home after spending five years on the HMS Beagle expedition. By then, John Stevens Henslow, Darwin’s botany professor, had already published the geological letters Darwin had sent him during his voyage as a pamphlet and sent it to famous naturalists in England. Moreover, the fossils and the plant, animal, and bird specimens Darwin had brought with him from his voyage, proved highly useful for zoologists. As a result, when he was just 27 years old, Darwin became famous among the scientific community in England.

    But Darwin’s accomplishments did not stop there. After all, Darwin wasn’t satisfied with being the one who helped formulate the most accepted theory of evolution. He wanted to be the one who formulated it. So, he set himself up on the mission to find out how evolution happens.

    The result of this mission was the Theory of Natural Selection and several other theories. In this blog post, we look at these theories of Darwin and find out which were correct and which weren’t.

    Darwin’s theories that are considered correct

    Theory of Natural Selection

    According to Darwin, Natural Selection happens due to variations that occur in some individuals of a species. If these variations are favorable and help the individuals survive until they reproduce, their variations are passed on to the next generation. If they are not favorable, then these individuals don’t get to reproduce, and hence, their variations are not passed on to the next generation. Thus, favorable variations are passed down to successive generations, whereas unfavorable variations die out. This mechanism forms the basis of evolution. According to Darwin, two processes may happen as a result of natural selection.

    Anagenesis

    If a species keeps evolving continuously as a result of the favorable variations that occur in some individuals, then, after several hundreds or thousands of generations, the resulting species might be completely different from the original species. By that time, the original species would have completely disappeared. Darwin calls this process where one species completely replaces another species Anagenesis. In this process, the original species produces only one new species and does not branch out.

    Speciation

    A variation of the concept of Anagenesis is Speciation. While in Anagenesis, only one new species is formed by replacing the original species, in Speciation, many new species can be formed by replacing the original species, which may differ from each other significantly. This happens in species, where some populations migrate to areas with weather conditions that are different from their home region.

    The populations that migrate might face different environmental conditions and survival threats. If these populations stay there in isolation from the original species and breed among themselves, then, after many generations, they may evolve differently when compared to the population that stayed back.

    For example, if a population migrated to a warmer environment, individuals in that population might develop body features to survive in hot climates. On the other hand, the population that migrated to a colder environment might evolve to survive in colder climates. So, after hundreds or thousands of generations, these populations would have evolved so differently when compared to each other that they couldn’t breed with members of the other population anymore. So, they need to be classified as a new species altogether.

    Evidences to support Darwin’s theories

    Natural Selection was a revolutionary concept. Darwin knew that it would take the world by surprise. By postulating that species evolve into completely different species over time, he would be implying that humans evolved from animals too. It would upset many religious heads because it would go against their core belief that God created humans. So, providing convincing evidence to back his theory of evolution became important for Darwin. Therefore, he spent almost two decades gathering evidence for it.

    But the time Darwin spent gathering evidence did not go to waste. When he finally published the 490-page abstract called ‘On the Origin of Species,’ he could quote examples from several fields, like paleontology, embryology, etc., as evidence to support his theory. Are you curious to find out what these pieces of evidence are? Then, keep reading.

    Bio-geography (The geographical distribution of plants and animals)

    One of the pieces of evidence that Darwin mentions in his books is the co-occurrence of several species of Galapagos Finches. Several species of these birds are found in the Galapagos, the group of isolated islands in the pacific ocean. The similarities between them suggest that they might have originated from a bird species in Central or South America, then migrated to these isolated islands, where they could have evolved into different species.

    Embryology

    Another example Darwin mentions in his books is the similarity between embryos. Darwin notes that during the initial stages of formation, the embryos of more evolved organisms like birds, animals, fishes, etc., appear similar to those of more primitive life-forms.

    Taxonomy (The classification of life-forms)

    Using the observable traits that organisms possess, biologists decide which organisms to group into the same family, species, etc. Darwin used the same technique to find out how evolution happened. He compared the traits of the life forms that existed during his time with those of fossils. Then, he deducted that the more similar traits a life form and a fossil shared, the closer they are linked through evolution.

    The proofs we have now

    Today, Darwin’s theory of evolution is widely accepted. The numerous fossils we have found over the ages serve as testimony to the correctness of his theory. By determining the age of the rocks in which these fossils are found, scientists are able to affirm one thing – The fossils of simple organisms are found in very old rocks, while the fossils of complex life forms are found in newer rocks. This proves that Darwin was correct in thinking that complex organisms evolved from simple organisms. 

    Darwin’s theories that are considered wrong

    Thus, as you can see, Darwin provided convincing evidence to back his theory of evolution. Yet, many people didn’t accept it because there was a missing link in his theory. Even though Darwin postulated that evolution happened due to the variations that occur in individuals, he couldn’t say why it happened. And in his attempt to explain why these variations occurred, Darwin postulated a theory, which turned out to be very wrong. 

    Pangenesis

    Darwin lived at a time when genetics wasn’t invented. So, to explain the missing link in his theory, Darwin proposed the theory of Pangenesis.

    Darwin’s theory

    According to this theory, the cells in our bodies shed super-tiny particles called Gemmules. When provided with the proper nutrition, these particles can grow into the cells from which they were shed. These Gemmules are dispersed throughout our bodies. The sexual organs collect gemmules from all parts of the body.

    So, when individuals of opposite sexes copulate, Gemmules from both individuals mix. If the Gemmules from a body part of one parent has superior numbers, the corresponding features of the resulting offspring resemble that parent. When an offspring develops inside its mother, Gemmules must grow and attach to one another in the proper amount and right order for the baby to be born healthy. If that doesn’t happen, the baby may be born with congenital disabilities.

    Darwin’s Pangenesis initially helped explain why children born to the same parents differ from each other. It also helped explain why children inherit features from parents, like hair color and diseases.

    Darwin’s theory and Lamarck’s theory

    But Darwin’s Theory of Pangenesis doesn’t end there. It also states that when a parent’s organ changes as a result of its behavioral changes, its Gemmules could be altered. These Gemmules could multiply and replace the old Gemmules. When these Gemmules are inherited by its offspring, their organs, too, are altered. The driving force behind this aspect of Darwin’s Pangenesis was Lamarck’s Theory of Acquired Characteristics. Lamarck’s theory of Acquired Characteristics states that when an organism changes its behavior in response to the environment, its organs change as a result. These changes are then inherited by its offspring. 

    Problem with Lamarck’s theory

    Today, we know that Lamarck’s theory is not correct. August Weismann disproved the theory using an experiment. He cut off the tails of rats for 22 generations. And yet, a tailless rat was never born.

    We can also easily observe this in human beings. Even if a person works hard to build his body and runs marathons for several years, his children do not inherit these characteristics. They still need to work equally hard to achieve the same level of fitness.

    Darwin tried to prove his theory through experiments. To prove Pangenesis, his cousin, Francis Galton, took the blood of a rabbit and injected it into another rabbit. If Darwin was right, then the offspring of the second rabbit should show the characteristics of the first rabbit. But that did not happen, and Darwin couldn’t prove his theory. 

    Moreover, Lamarck’s Theory of Acquired Characteristics was disproved several years later. And with it, Darwin’s Theory of Pangenesis, too, was disproved. 

    The correct reason behind genetic variations

    But we now know that evolution has nothing to do with Darwin’s theory of Gemmules mixing together. It actually happens due to the genetic variations that occur in individuals. The cells in our bodies contain DNA, which contains genes from our parents. Every time a baby is formed, the genes of the parents mix together in a unique way. So, even siblings differ from each other significantly.

    Moreover, when cells divide, they make copies of the DNA they contain. But this copying process is not always perfect. Sometimes, the copies of the DNA don’t come out perfect, thereby introducing mutation. Every person probably has so many mutations in their body that they can’t possibly keep track of.

    These mutations and the genetic shuffling at birth create variations in individuals that make evolution possible.

    Earth’s age

    During the time Darwin lived, most Europeans believed in Bible’s statement that the earth was 6,000 years old. But Darwin did not think it was enough time for life to form and evolve to an intelligent life form. He believed that earth was definitely much older.

    So, when a Scottish engineer called William Thomson proposed that the earth was 100 million years old, Darwin immediately embraced it. But Darwin’s bet turned out to be wrong since we know now that the earth is more than 4.5 billion years old.

    The Tree of Life

    Another thing that Darwin got wrong was the Tree of Life. The Tree of Life is a diagram that Darwin drew in 1837, portraying evolution as a single tree branching and re-branching. Darwin might have been correct in thinking that complex organisms evolved from simple organisms. But his idea of evolution as being a single tree, where one big branch (Of course, each branch denotes a species) branches into several small branches, and each of these small branches then branches into even smaller branches, turned out to be wrong.

    Charles Darwin's thoughts on how evolution progressed

    Charles Darwin’s drawing of evolution as a single tree – By Charles DarwinPage 36 of Notebook B: [Transmutation of species (1837-1838)]. ‘commenced. . . July 1837’; from Darwin Online, Public Domain, Public Domain, Link

    The correct way to depict evolution

    Recent genetic tests on plants, animals, and bacteria reveal that several species frequently cross-breed with other species. This means that instead of genes being passed down from one big branch to several smaller branches beneath it in the same evolutionary path, they are also transferred between species on different evolutionary paths.

    To make it easier to understand, Darwin thought that only individuals within a species (say A) breed with each other. So, when new species evolve from A (say A1, A2, A3), they contain genes from the individuals in species A. But in nature, individuals in species A breed with individuals from other species (say B) as well. So, the species that result from this cross-breeding (say AB1, AB2, AB3) will have genes from both species A and B.

    Theories of Darwin - An illustration of how to actually depict evolution

    An illustration showing the correct way to depict evolution (Left – Darwin’s method, Right – Recent method)

    Hence, instead of representing evolution as a tree, it would be more apt to represent it as a web.

  • The Visible Spectrum – Truth About The Light You See

    The Visible Spectrum – Truth About The Light You See

    The visible spectrum we see is a part of the electromagnetic waves. Electromagnetic waves are oscillating electric and magnetic fields.

    Depending on their wavelengths, the frequencies and energies of the electromagnetic waves vary. Some of them are even harmful for life.

    This blog post explains some basic phenomena that the visible spectrum causes. It also answers some ‘What-If’ questions we all might have had at some point in time.

    The Visible spectrum

    The light we see is known as visible light. It has wavelengths ranging from 740 nm to 380 nm approximately and is divided into 7 regions – VIBGYOR.

    Why can we see only visible light?

    Visible light played a great role in our evolution, helping us recognize the prey and enemy correctly. Our atmosphere blocks most of the electromagnetic waves other than visible light and radio waves (look at the picture below).

    Electromagnetic radiation vs Atmospheric absorption

    Atmospheric opacity (absorption) vs Wavelength of EM wavesPicture credits

    Only visible light can penetrate water and propagate through it for a certain distance, the earliest life forms probably evolved the ability to see visible light, to survive underwater. Since life moved from water to land, we probably got the ability from these organisms.

    The retinas in our eyes have three primary color receptors – Red, Green, and Blue. Hence, we are more sensitive and responsive to these three colors than other colors. With these three receptors, we can see a million shades of color.

    But wait…

    What would happen if we could see other electromagnetic waves?

    Read on, to find out.

    What would happen if you could see only radio waves?

    If our eyes could see only radio waves, we wouldn’t see small objects because they have long wavelengths and pass through small objects but not reflected by them. Since we only see the color reflected by an object, smaller objects would have become invisible to us. 

    As you can see in the picture below, radio waves pass through the human body completely. So, if we were to see only radio waves, we wouldn’t be able to see fellow human beings, because the human body cannot reflect radio waves.

    The visible spectrum - aborption of different EM waves by human body

    Different EM waves passing through body. Arrow depicts the depth to which they each wave penetrates through body. Picture credits

    What would happen if you could see only microwaves?

    Since microwaves are emitted by dustclouds that give birth to stars, if you look up at the sky, it would be too bright for you, because of the light from Big Bang coming at us from all angles.

    Objects that emit microwaves, like microwave ovens, GPS, Wi-Fi, traffic speed cameras, etc would also appear too bright for us. On the other hand, we may not be able to see other humans because microwaves pass through people without being reflected.

    What would happen if you could only see infrared?

    If you could see only infrared, you would only be able to see temperatures, not colors. Most of the features of objects will be missing, and for example, you may not be able to see a person’s eyes, nose, mouth, etc. Hotter objects would look brighter. 

    7 types of electromagnetic waves - Infrared image

    Infrared image of a man holding a plastic cover.Picture credits:NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (SSC)

    What would happen if you could only see UV light?

    If we could see only ultraviolet light, you could see a lot of things that you see now. But, it could have damaged our eyes. 

    A UV image

    UV light portrait – wavelengths from 335 to 365 nm. By Spigget – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

    What would happen if you could only see X-rays?

    We won’t be able to see X-rays because the earth’s atmosphere blocks out all X-rays coming from space. If our eyes could only see X-rays, we wouldn’t be able to see the outer surface of objects. 

    X-ray of a person's hand while using a mouse

    X-ray of a person’s hand while using a mouse

    For example, if you saw a human, you would most probably see his bones; however, when you touch him, you would be able to touch his skin. Your eyes would ignore critical information needed to identify a person/object, For example, judging distances while driving.

    More importantly, if something was too bright for you to see, you won’t be able to block it by closing your eyelids. 

    What would happen if you could only see gamma rays?

    Our atmosphere blocks almost all gamma rays coming from space, and radioactive materials are the only objects that can emit gamma rays on earth.

    So, if we could see only gamma rays, other than radioactive materials, we wouldn’t have been able to see anything else. If you look at people, you would see nothing because they can even pass through bones. 

    Visible light - gamma ray capture of entire night sky

    Greater gamma rays’ image of entire sky from the CGRO spacecraft. By NASA – http://heasarc.nasa.gov/ docs/cgro/images/epo/ gallery/skymaps/sky_egret.gif (http://heasarc.nasa.gov/ docs/cgro/images/epo/ gallery/skymaps/index.html), Public Domain, Link

    What would happen if you could see everything?

    If you could suddenly see all the light waves, there would be so much light everywhere that it would be too difficult to see anything at all. But, more importantly, your brain would be bombarded with too much information all of a sudden, that could confuse your brain. In the worst-case scenario, you would either go blind and not see anything at all, or see everything, go into shock and die. 

    Besides making it possible to perceive objects, visible light has other applications. Analyzing the color emitted by various objects and phenomena has helped us understand these objects and phenomena better.

    Phenomena related to visible light

    Why does the sky appear blue?

    The sky appears blue because the blue light is scattered more by the Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules in the atmosphere than other colors. 

    What is scattering?

    Light waves are electromagnetic waves. They are composed of oscillating (rapidly moving up and down) electric and magnetic fields. 

    When these waves come in contact with the Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules in the atmosphere (made of 78% Nitrogen and 21% Oxygen), they excite the electrons of these molecules (charged particles start moving when exposed to an electric field), which start moving rapidly. In turn, these excited electrons emit electromagnetic waves of the same frequency and return to their normal state. This process is called scattering

    According to Rayleigh’s scattering, when the wavelength of the waves is several times higher than the size of the scattering particle, scattering increases with frequency. Since the size of Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules are close to 300 pm and visible light has a wavelength of 380 nm – 740 nm, higher frequencies of the visible light are scattered more. Hence, Blue light is scattered more than red light giving the sky blue color.

    Why does the sky not appear Violet if Violet has a higher frequency than Blue color?

    Even though violet light has a higher frequency than blue light, since the sun sends less violet light than blue light, blue light gets scattered more. Moreover, our eyes are more sensitive to blue light than violet light. Hence, the sky does not appear violet.

    Why does the sky appear red at sunrise and sunset?

    During sunrise and sunset, the sunlight has to travel longer distances through the atmosphere to reach our eyes. During this time, most of the blue light has already scattered, leaving only red light to be scattered. Therefore, the sky appears red at sunrise and sunset. 

    Why does seawater appear blue in color?

    In the visible spectrum, (as you can see in the picture below) high wavelengths are absorbed more by water than lower wavelengths, i.e., red, yellow, and green lights are absorbed more than blue light. In other words, blue light is reflected more than the other colors. So, the sea appears blue in color. 

    The visible spectrum - wavelength vs. absorption in water

    Absorption in water vs. wavelength of EM wavesPicture credits – http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_vibrational_spectrum.html

    However, this is not always true. If there are particles in the water, these particles may absorb some other colors and reflect others, giving the water a color other than blue. For example, in places where there are a lot of Algae, the water appears green in color. 

    Applications of visible spectrum

    Determining the temperature of a star

    The color emitted by a star tells us a lot about its temperature. As the temperature of a star increases, the higher its energy and the lower the wavelength of light waves emitted by it. So, a star that burns Blue is hotter than a star that burns Yellow (Sun – 6,000 K), which is hotter than a star that burns Red.

    Visible spectrum - Star color vs temperature

    Weather forecasting

    By feeding the infrared and visible light images of the earth, made by satellites, as inputs to weather prediction models, scientists can forecast weather effectively. 

    VLC

    VLC (Visible Light Communication) is a mode of communication in which LEDs (and other sources of visible light) are used to transfer data with high speeds over short distances (up to 2 km)

    Photosynthesis

    Photosynthesis, which is essential for the survival of most life on earth, would have been impossible without visible light.

    If you liked this blog post on visible spectrum, the following blog posts might interest you too:

    1. Different types of Waves
    2. 7 types of electromagnetic waves
    3. Dangers of electromagnetic radiation
  • 7 Types of Electromagnetic Waves & Their Applications

    7 Types of Electromagnetic Waves & Their Applications

    Whenever we think of waves, what jumps to our minds immediately are sea waves, which are mechanical waves. However, mechanical waves are not the only type of waves. There are also other types of waves, like electromagnetic waves. Compared to mechanical waves, electromagnetic waves can even travel through vacuum, because they don’t require a medium for propagation. In this blog post, we will look at what the 7 types of electromagnetic waves are, how they are produced, and what their uses are.

    What are electromagnetic waves?

    If you remember what we learned about waves, you will remember that mechanical waves transmit energy and require a medium (gas, liquid, or solid) for propagation. Electromagnetic waves are different from mechanical waves since they don’t need a medium for propagation and hence, can travel through vacuum.

    A picture depicting waves, their behavior, their properties, and their applications

    Electromagnetic waves, their properties, behavior and applications

    You can read more about the properties and behavior of electromagnetic waves here: How do waves affect your daily life?

    To understand how electromagnetic waves are produced, we have to dive into the basics of electromagnetics a little bit.

    Electric field

    We know that a particle can have any of the three electric charges – positive (For example, proton = unit positive charge), negative (Eg. electron = unit negative charge), or neutral (Ex. neutron). Depending on its electric charge, it might exert an electric force on another object,i.e., opposite charges attract, and the same charges repel each other. 

    The force with which a unit charge attracts or repels other charges is called the electric field. The electric field flows from a positive charge (outward) to a negative charge (inward).

    Picture depicting the electric field between a unit positive and negative charge

    By Geek3 – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

    If you consider a positive charge and a negative charge which are in motion, the electric field between them (the arrow in the picture) changes in value and direction, as shown below.

    Moving electric charges and electric field

    Moving electric charges and the electric field

    A graph of electric field vs. time

    Electric field vs Time

    As you can see from the second picture, the change of the electric field, when plotted against time, looks like a sine wave.

    Electric field generates a Magnetic field

    According to Ampere’s Circuital law, a change in the electric field produces a magnetic field. The generated magnetic field is perpendicular to the electric field. 

    An electromagnetic wave is a combination of oscillating electric and magnetic fields moving through space at the speed of light. Electromagnetic waves can be generated by accelerating a charged particle.

    7 types of electromagnetic waves - Propagation of an electromagnetic wave

    Image credits (E = Electric field, B = Magnetic field, C = direction of movement of the wave with speed of light)

    Why is the study of electromagnetic waves important?

    Electromagnetic waves are everywhere around us. Therefore, understanding these waves is the key to understanding the functioning of various devices around us. However, in this generation, most of us don’t care how these devices work. So, we often end up overlooking their harmful effects. 

    In the science category, one of our main aims is to help you understand how everything around you work. By reading our blog posts, you can understand the functionality of various devices. Moreover, you will also be able to protect yourself from their harmful effects.

    Modes of propagation

    Electromagnetic waves can travel in one or more of the following modes. Depending on their wavelengths, they can travel in some modes, but not in others. Each mode has its own advantages.

    Line-of-sight

    This is the most common mode of propagation of electromagnetic waves. In this mode, the waves travel only in a straight line. They either reach the receiver or are absorbed, reflected, refracted, or diffracted by the particles in the atmosphere. But they cannot travel over obstacles.

    As waves travel long distances in a straight line, they tend to move away from the earth. Eventually, at the end of the horizon, they leave the earth, since the earth is spherical. Therefore, repeaters (towers) at regular intervals are indispensable to send these waves over long distances.

    Ground waves

    If the wavelength of the wave is large enough, obstacles like mountains can diffract these waves towards the surface of the earth once again. Therefore, these waves travel longer along the surface of the earth. These waves are called ground waves.

    Skywaves

    The waves that leave the earth’s horizon are also reflected or refracted back to earth by thecharged particles in the ionosphere. These waves are called skywaves.

    7 types of electromagnetic waves - Graphical illustration of skywaves and ground waves

    Picture credits

    EM waves vs Atmospheric absorption

    There are seven types of EM waves and some of them are hazardous to living beings. But our atmosphere blocks most of these waves that come from outer space. The picture below depicts which wavelengths of EM waves are blocked by the atmosphere and which wavelengths pass through the atmosphere.

    Electromagnetic radiation vs Atmospheric absorption

    Picture credits

    7 Types of Electromagnetic waves

    Electromagnetic waves are classified based on their frequency. Depending on their frequency, they can have different applications as well as pose different health risks upon over-exposure.

    f = c / λ

    where f is the frequency of the wave, c is the speed of light and λ is the wavelength of the wave. As you can see, the frequency of the wave increases as its wavelength decreases.

    The electromagnetic spectrum consists of electromagnetic waves whose wavelengths vary from several thousand kilometers to a few picometers.

    The electromagnetic spectrum is home to 7 types of electromagnetic waves. Each electromagnetic wave has a unique wavelength/frequency range and has distinct characteristics. Arranged in terms of decreasing wavelengths, these 7 types of electromagnetic waves are Radio waves, Microwaves, Infrared light, Visible light, Ultraviolet light, X-rays, and Gamma-rays.

    Harmful effects of electromagnetic waves

    As the wavelength reduces, the energy of the emitted wave increases. But with the increase in the energy of an electromagnetic wave, the danger it poses to living cells also increases. Hence, radio waves pose the least danger to us since they carry very little energy. On the contrary, at the other end of the spectrum, gamma rays have the most energy and are extremely dangerous.

    You can read more about the harmful effects of electromagnetic waves in our blog post here: Dangers of electromagnetic radiation.

    7 types of electromagnetic waves

    Electromagnetic waves

    Food for thought:

    Why does the energy increase with an increase in frequency (or a decrease in wavelength)?

    I will try to answer it using an analogy.

    If you wiggle a rope whose one end is attached to a wall, you will create a wave in the rope. The faster you move your hands, the higher the frequency of the waves generated in the rope, and the more exhausted you will get while doing it.

    Similarly, creating a high-frequency wave requires a powerful energy source, and the generated wave carries a huge amount of energy.

    1. Radio waves

    Radio waves have the longest wavelengths and the least energy of all electromagnetic waves. There are different types of radio waves. Different types of radio waves have different penetrating abilities and have different uses. However, their most common and widespread use is in communication technologies like radio, television, mobile phones, etc.

    You can read more about radio waves in our blog post here: Applications of radio waves.

    2. Microwaves & Millimeter waves

    Today, due to the advancement in technology, generating electromagnetic waves of much shorter wavelengths has become easier. But in the 1920s and 1930s, generating radio waves that have far greater wavelengths (hundreds of meters) was more common. Hence, when physicists discovered microwaves, they noticed that they had relatively smaller wavelengths when compared to radio waves. So they simply named them microwaves because ‘micro’ meant ‘small’.

    On the contrary, millimeter waves got their name because their wavelengths lie in the millimeter range (1mm to 1cm).

    You can read about microwaves and millimeter waves in our blog post here: Applications of radio waves.

    3. Infrared waves

    Infrared rays are heat waves given off by most objects. They have wavelengths ranging from 1 mm to 700 nm.

    Infrared waves cannot penetrate walls. They travel only through line-of-sight.

    Infrared rays are not visible to our naked eyes since we can only see wavelengths between 380 nm and 740 nm. Around 52% of the energy that reaches the earth from the sun is Infrared radiation. But they have very high attenuation. So, we don’t use infrared waves for outdoor communication.

    7 types of electromagnetic waves - Infrared image

    Infrared image of a man holding a plastic cover.Picture credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (SSC)

    Applications

    Nightvision goggles

    Most objects emit heat in the form of infrared waves at room temperature. Nightvision goggles use these infrared rays to provide vision at night when the visible light is insufficient.

    Remote controls

    Remote controls use highly focused and narrow infrared waves generated by infrared LEDs. Since infrared waves cannot penetrate walls, they don’t interfere with the functioning of other infrared devices.

    Homing of missiles

    Missiles are programmed to follow and hit heat sources that emit infrared radiation (the engine of the other aircraft). Thus, infrared waves make the passive homing of missiles possible.

    Finding baby stars and planets

    Stars emit most of their energy as visible light and less energy as infrared waves.

    On the other hand, baby stars and planets emit a lot of infrared radiation because they are colder. Hence, by reading the infrared signatures (instead of visible light) of galaxies and dust clouds, astrophysicists can identify baby stars and planets easily.

    Weather forecasting

    Along with images in the visible light spectrum, images in the infrared region (from weather satellites) help make weather forecasting possible.

    Finding original versions of art pieces

    Infrared rays can penetrate the underlying layers in paintings. So, they can reveal if the painting is the original version or a version modified by an artist or someone else.

    4. Visible light

    Visible light is the range of frequencies that are visible to our naked eyes. You can read more about visible light and its properties in our blog post here: The visible spectrum.

    5. Ultraviolet (UV) rays

    Ultraviolet rays (in ‘Latin’ Ultra means ‘Beyond’) have wavelengths ranging from 400 nm to 10 nm. Some small birds have receptors for UV light. But humans cannot see it.

    A UV image

    UV light portrait – wavelengths from 335 to 365 nm. By Spigget – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

    UV rays cause suntans and sunburns by making the body release Melanin in response to the damage it does to the skin.

    Exposure to UVA rays

    UVA rays (not blocked by the ozone layer) have wavelengths ranging from 400 nm to 320 nm. They can create suntans and sunburns that have no health advantages and sometimes cause cancer. Sunscreens provide little protection against suntan caused by UVA rays.

    Exposure to UVB rays

    However, exposure to UVB rays (320 nm to 280 nm) can create suntans that last for weeks or months and protect the skin from further UV damage with an SPF of 3 (3 times more protection against UV rays than normal skin). Exposure to UVB rays also leads to the creation of Vitamin D in the lower levels of our skin. But the Ozone layer almost completely blocks it. Moreover, sunscreens block most of the UVB rays too. 

    Dangers of electromagnetic radiaion - A sunburn

    Sunburn on a woman’s back.By FAL101 at English Wikipedia – Own work by the original uploader, CC0, Link

    Food for thought:

    Can you protect yourself from UV rays by sitting in the shade?

    No.

    Even if you are in the shade, UV rays can still reach your skin and eyes indirectly and damage them. That’s why proper clothing, hats, sunscreen, and sunglasses are required to protect yourself from UV radiation, even if you are sitting in the shade.

    Are people with fair skin more susceptible to sunburns than darker people?

    Yes. The natural pigment melanin, besides being responsible for our skin-, hair- and eye-colors, also protects our skin from getting burned. Darker people, who have a higher concentration of melanin, are more immune to UV radiation than people with fair skin. Therefore, they can stay longer in the sunlight without getting tanned or getting burned.

    Applications

    Some materials can glow and fluoresce when exposed to UV light. Fluorescence is the phenomenon in which some materials absorb light of lower wavelengths (For example, UV light) and emit radiation of higher wavelengths (For example, visible light). 

    This fluorescence-property of UV light has many applications

    1. Crime-scene inspection (Bodily fluids like saliva, semen, and urine fluoresce when exposed to UV light)

    2. Identifying counterfeit currency notes

    3. Detecting the presence of pests in agriculture (Urine of rodents fluoresce when exposed to UV light), and 

    4. Verifying the originality of art and collectibles, etc. 

    6. X-rays

    X-rays are electromagnetic waves with wavelengths ranging from 3 nm to 0.03 nm

    How are X-rays produced?

    When accelerated electrons hit atoms of metals (Copper, Galium, etc.), they make the electrons in inner orbits leave their orbits. As a result, the atoms of these metals become unstable. So, electrons from the outer orbit move to the inner orbit to stabilize the atom, thereby releasing an X-ray in the process.

    How did X-rays get their name?

    The German physics professor Wilhelm Röntgen, who discovered the X-rays on November 8th, 1895, didn’t know what type of radiation it was. So, he referred to the radiation as ‘X.’ This gave X-rays their name.

    7 types of electromagnetic waves - An X-ray image

    X-ray of chest. Picture credits & License

    Applications

    Scans

    The most common application of X-rays is in creating scans.

    An X-ray scan uses X-rays to create medical imagery of an interior body part. X-rays are attenuated slightly by soft tissues and organs but are attenuated heavily by the Calcium in the bones. Therefore, on the Radiograph (image produced by X-rays or Gamma rays for medical purposes), the bones appear as white. 

    A CT (Computed Tomography) scan combines several X-rays (taken at different angles) to obtain a 3D-image of the body part. 

    Airport security systems use X-rays to scan your luggage.

    Fighting cancer

    X-rays are ionizing. Therefore, radiotherapy uses X-rays to kill cancerous cells in the body. Thus, X-rays play a major role in fighting cancer.

    Astronomical observations

    Several celestial bodies, like Black holes and neutron stars, emit X-rays. So, studying these X-rays help understand these bodies better. But our atmosphere almost completely blocks X-rays from outer space. So, astrophysicists install X-ray telescopes at very high altitudes or in an artificial satellite.

    7. Gamma-rays

    Gamma-rays are very similar to X-rays. However, their major difference is in the way they are produced. While X-rays are produced by electrons, Gamma-rays are produced by nuclei.

    How are Gamma rays produced?

    After a radioactive material decays, the resulting daughter nucleus that is in an excited state releases a Gamma-ray to reach a stable, low-energy state. Hence, both nuclear fission and nuclear fusion can produce Gamma-rays.

    Applications

    Fight cancer

    Similar to X-rays, the ionizing property of Gamma-rays is useful in the medical field for killing cancer and tumor cells. A Gamma knife surgery focuses multiple concentrated Gamma rays on a cancerous growth from different angles. Thus, it minimizes damage to healthy tissues while destroying the cancerous growth.

    Astronomical observations

    Massive stars release a huge amount of energy and a large amount of Gamma-rays when they collapse. However, this phenomenon, called a Gamma-ray burst, is very rare because it lasts only for a very short time. For example, a Gamma-ray burst can release more energy in 10 seconds than the sun can emit in 10 billion years. Therefore, by analyzing Gamma-rays, such phenomena can be studied. But just like X-rays, our atmosphere almost completely blocks Gamma-rays too. So, astrophysicists install Gamma-ray telescopes at very high altitudes or in an artificial satellite to study Gamma-rays from outer space.

    For example, the image below was recorded by NASA’s Swift satellite. It depicts a gamma-ray blast caused by the birth of a black hole 12.8 billion light years away (below). This object is among the most distant objects ever detected.

    7 types of electromagnetic waves - A picture depicting a Gamma ray burst

    Picture credits: NASA/Swift/Stefan Immler, et al.

    Gamma-rays also help determine the elements on other planets.

    Sterilization

    Gamma rays can kill microorganisms like fungi, bacteria, and viruses. Therefore, they are used for sterilization in various fields:

    1. Medical fields – to sterilize surgical tools and disposable syringes before use.

    2. Hygiene – to sterilize food items (like frog legs) to improve hygiene. 

    3. Art – to sterilize pieces of art, thereby killing the microorganisms on these art pieces and protecting them against degradation.

    We hope that this blog post helped you understand what the 7 types of electromagnetic waves are, how they are produced and what their uses are. If you liked this blog post, please share it with your friends.

  • Applications of Radio Waves in Real-Life

    Applications of Radio Waves in Real-Life

    Radio waves have the longest wavelengths and the least energy of all electromagnetic waves. The applications of radio waves in real life are numerous. However, their widespread use is in communication technologies like radio, television, mobile phones, etc.

    Types of Radio waves

    We can classify radio waves into different classes based on their frequency. Depending on their frequency, radio waves have different characteristics and, hence, different applications.

    Applications of radio waves - Different radio waves based on frequencies

    Applications of radio waves

    ELF & VLF

    These radio waves have very long wavelengths (> 10 km). Since they have enormous wavelengths, normal objects cannot reflect them. Therefore, they can easily pass through obstacles like water and buildings.

    Applications

    Due to their characteristics, several countries use ELF & VLF radio waves for transmitting and receiving messages to and from submarines and inside caves and mines. The depth to which these radio waves can communicate depends on the wavelength of the radio wave used.

    Picture of a submarine

    Problem of transmitting

    For antennas to transmit an EM signal, their size should be equal to the wavelength of the transmitted EM wave. However, if that is not possible, their size should at least be equal to half or quarter of the wavelength of the EM wave.

    ELF waves have enormous wavelengths. So, the antennas used for sending ELF radio waves need to be enormous. Since it is not an easy task, only four countries in the world have managed to build it – the US, Russia, China, and India.

    Food for thought: 

    Why can waves with longer wavelengths pass through objects easily?

    If the wavelength of the wave is smaller compared to the dimensions of the obstacle, it gets reflected. If the wavelength is larger, it passes through the obstacle or gets diffracted around it.

    A picture showing how frequency affects reflection

    Picture credits

    LF and MF

    Radio waves with frequencies less than 3MHz (approximately) can travel as skywaves and ground waves. LF and MF have long wavelengths (100 m to 10 km) and small frequencies (30kHz to 3MHz). So, they can travel long distances (up to 2000km) as skywaves and ground waves. Moreover, they have less attenuation too. So, they are the preferred mode for long-distance communication.

    Applications

    Radio waves with frequencies below Medium Frequencies serve as ideal candidates for long-distance communication. However, for this purpose, they need to have vertical antennas. But creating vertical antennas (comparable to the wavelengths of waves) to transmit radio waves ranging from ELF to VLF is impractical. So, mostly, only LF and MF are used for long-distance communication. The primary use of LF and MF is in aviation and marineradio, as well as AM radios.

    HF

    HF waves have wavelengths ranging from 10 m to 100 m. They can travel long distances as skywaves.

    Applications

    HF waves can travel long distances. Hence, they can travel over countries or continents to transmit information. In addition to that, they can also transmit information to hill stations where line-of-sight communication is impossible.

    They are used for shortwave international as well as regional communication, weather stations, aviation communication, etc.

    VHF

    VHF radio waves have wavelengths between 1 m and 10 m. Their wavelengths are not long enough for them to propagate as ground waves or skywaves. So, they can only communicate by Line-of-sight. Hence, their range is limited by the horizon of the earth (up to 160 km).

    On the other hand, due to their small wavelengths, their transmitting antennas can be small enough to be fitted on a vehicle or building.

    Food for thought:

    Why do you have to adjust your TV’s antenna at times?

    Picture of a TV antenna

    Picture credits

    VHF radio waves can penetrate walls. But hills and mountains can completely block them.

    Since their wavelengths are comparable to the size of buildings, buildings can reflect these radio waves leading to interference in television signals. Atmosphere may slightly change the direction from which the strongest signals come. Weather (absorption of VHF by rain) can also weaken the signal.

    Since the mode of propagation is only Line-of-sight, you have to adjust the antenna to point in the direction of the strongest signal, so that it receives the complete length of the waves.

    A radio wave passing through an antenna

    Picture credits

    Applications

    They have a wide range of applications including FM broadcasting, television broadcasting, walkie talkies, air-traffic control communication, etc.

    UHF

    The wavelength here ranges from 10 cm to 1 m.

    These waves can travel through walls.

    UHF waves can only propagate through Line-of-sight since they cannot travel as ground waves or skywaves. Therefore, they have a maximum range of 64 km. But, because of this, neighboring regions can use the same frequencies of UHF.

    Food for thought:

    Why does your mobile phone not work properly in overpopulated areas or when it rains?

    The small wavelength of UHF leads to a loss in quality due to interference caused by buildings, trees, etc. Rain can also attenuate the waves significantly. That’s why your mobile phones may not work properly in highly populated urban areas or when it is raining.

    Applications

    The transmitting antenna can be small enough to be fitted in handheld devices. Hence, they have a variety of applications like use in cell phones, digital televisions, GPS, walkie talkies, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, etc.

    Microwaves

    These radio waves have wavelengths ranging from 1 cm to 1 m. Microwaves got their name due to their relatively smaller wavelengths compared to radio waves.

    Radio waves consist of two wavelength separations: Ultra High Frequency (UHF) waves and Super High Frequency (SHF) waves.

    SHF waves have short wavelengths ranging from 10 cm to 1 cm. Hence, antennas the size of several times the wavelength of these waves can be used to create highly narrow beams. Therefore, these waves can be sent accurately from the transmitter to the receiver. 

    Applications

    They have a wide range of applications like Wi-Fi, Radar (RAdio Detection And Ranging), Communications satellites, microwave ovens, trafffic speed cameras, etc.

    Applications of radio waves - Functioning of a communications satellite

    SHF waves cannot penetrate walls as much as UHF waves. Therefore, when your Wi-Fi transmitter is located in not located in the same room as your Wi-Fi device, the signal is weak.

    Microwaves are the only radio waves whose frequencies are high enough to be transmitted over long distances without significant attenuation while remaining low enough to be transmitted as narrow beams so that the same frequencies can be reused in neighboring regions.

    Hence, microwaves are the major carriers of high-speed data between different stations on Earth. In addition to that, they also transfer data between stations on earth and communication satellites. A system of such communication satellites enable all kinds of communications like television and telephone.

    What does a communications satellite do?

    Communications satellites are satellites that mostly remain in geostationary orbits. They rotate the earth at the same speed of rotation of the earth. Moreover, they stay at the same latitude and longitude all year round. So, for an observer on earth, they appear to be at the same position all the time. Therefore, we can fix a receiver on earth at a position and angle to point to and communicate with such a satellite permanently. 

    A communications satellite’s major function is to increase the range of the microwaves. Since microwaves have small wavelengths, they can only travel by Line-Of-Sight. So, the earth’s horizon as well as attenuation limit their range to 64 km. Therefore, to increase their range, they are sent to a geostationary satellite orbiting the earth at 36,000 km above the Equator. The satellite receives these waves and sends them to other satellites or to other receivers on the earth, to enable communication over long distances. 

    What are communication satellites used for?

    Communications satellites make international calls, internet, long-distance television- and radio-broadcasting possible.

    Food for thought

    If the range of a microwave is just 64 km, how can it be transmitted to a satellite orbiting at 36,000 km above the Equator?

    The range of a microwave is 64 km because, beyond this distance, they either leave the earth’s horizon or are attenuated by obstacles like trees, buildings, etc. But, by sending it to a satellite (by pointing it to the sky) where there are no obstacles in the way through Line-of-sight, they are not entirely attenuated. 

    The attenuation is still there since the waves have to travel very long distances compared to their wavelengths. Hence, satellites in other orbits (low- and medium-earth orbits) are also used for this purpose. However, unlike geostationary satellites, they don’t appear to stay at a fixed position above earth. Hence, unlike in geostationary orbits, in other orbits, an uninterrupted connection is impossible, unless several satellites are used.

    How does a Radar work?

    In Radar, the transmitter and receiver are both located in the Radar. The microwaves that are sent by the transmitter are reflected off an object and are received by the receiver, providing details like the object’s location, speed, and direction.

    They are used in ships, airplanes, military purposes, pre-collision systems in cars, etc.

    Millimeter-waves

    Millimeter-waves are radio waves whose wavelengths lie between 1 cm and 1 mm. They have high atmospheric attenuation. Therefore, they have a range of 1 km or less. Since their wavelengths are in the size of rain droplets, rain droplets can absorb these waves. Hence, rain and moisture can reduce their range even further.

    Applications

    Airport security screening

    Since they have small wavelengths, they can pass through our clothes but are reflected by small metal objects.

    Applications of radio waves - Airport security checking

    Millimeter wave security screening at Cologne AirportBy © Raimond Spekking / CC BY-SA 4.0 (via Wikimedia Commons), CC BY-SA 4.0, Link

    Therefore, they are used in whole-body security-checks in airports. They are also used in 5G communication. 

    Remote sensing

    Remote sensing is the process of obtaining information about an object without making any physical contact with it. In remote sensing, by measuring the radio waves (mostly millimeter waves and microwaves) emitted or reflected by an object, the characteristics of the object, like its structure, altitude, etc. can be determined. 

    Millimeter waves can pass through clouds easily. But they cannot pass through other objects, like metallic structures. So, these objects reflect them. Therefore, Millimeter waves are good candidates for remote sensing. Similarly, they can pass through non-metallic surfaces, but not through metallic objects within these non-metallic surfaces. Therefore, they are also useful in oceanography, geology, geography, etc.

    Radio astronomy

    Explosions in outer space can reach scorching temperatures. So, they emit cosmic radio waves (EM waves from space) of longer wavelengths.

    In contrast, colder environments emit only radio waves of shorter wavelengths. Some of these colder environments are the dust clouds. They are the birthplaces of stars. Dust clouds are extremely cold (approximately -253°C) and don’t emit visible light. They emit only millimeter waves. So, studying these millimeter waves is necessary to understand the composition of dust clouds and stars. Thus, millimeter waves are extremely important in radio astronomy.

    We hope that this blog post helped you understand the applications of radio waves in real-life. If you liked this blog post, read our other blog posts too.

    1. 7 types of electromagnetic waves
    2. Different types of waves
    3. Dangers of electromagnetic radiation
  • Dangers Of Electromagnetic Radiation – Myths Vs. Facts

    Dangers Of Electromagnetic Radiation – Myths Vs. Facts

    From TV to cell phone, from CT scan to weather forecasting, from Wi-Fi to astronomy, electromagnetic waves are everywhere around us. However, most of us are not aware of their harmful effects and believe whatever we hear about them. So, I wrote this blog post to help everyone understand the dangers of electromagnetic radiation.

    Generally, electromagnetic waves, which have higher energy, are more dangerous than those with lower energies. However, to understand which radiation is more harmful, and why it is harmful, we have to know how it transfers energy as it passes through matter. 

    There are two methods in which EM waves transfer energy to biologic material.

    Types of radiation

    Based on how they interact with matter, electromagnetic waves can be broadly classified into two types.

    1. Non-Ionizing waves (Excitation)

    The EM wave transfers energy to an electron in the outer shell to move it to an inner shell of higher energy without removing the electron from the atom. The process is called excitation, and the wave is called a non-ionizing wave.

    Harmful effects of Non-ionizing EM waves

    Non-ionizing waves are not harmful when exposed to, in small doses.

    But when exposed to high doses, they can significantly heat the body tissues (for example, microwave oven). Wearing regular clothing can protect against a normal dosage of these waves.

    If the source of non-ionizing waves is extremely hot, it can induce thermal ionization of atoms.

    2. Ionizing waves (Ionization)

    The EM wave transfers enough energy to remove (eject) one or more electrons from the atom. The process is called ionization and the wave that is capable of doing it is called an ionizing wave.

    Harmful effects of Ionizing EM waves

    Ionizing electromagnetic rays are extremely hazardous to life. They can cause damage to us in one of the following two ways.

    1. damage a tissue (For example, sunburn) by killing the cells in the tissue, when exposed to high doses, or
    2. cause cancer and genetic diseases by changing the DNA in the cells, when exposed tolower doses.

    Food for thought:

    Why do small doses of exposure to ionizing EM waves have long-lasting consequences than high doses of exposure?

    After the DNA in the cells are broken down, our bodies are more likely to repair the damage if the radiation’s dosage is high. If the dosage is low, our bodies likely ignore the damage caused. Hence, lower doses can cause long-lasting consequences like cancer or genetic diseases.

    Dangers of electromagnetic waves - The electromagnetic spectrum

    Harmful effects of Ionizing vs non-Ionizing EM wavesPicture credits

    Why doesn’t harmful radiation from outer space harm us?

    Earth’s atmosphere and magnetic field act as a shield blocking all the dangerous ionizing waves from entering the earth. The picture below depicts this (In the picture above, Gamma-rays are at the far right. However, in the picture below, they are in the far left).

    Life wouldn’t have been possible on earth without this natural protection.

    Electromagnetic radiation vs Atmospheric absorption

    Atmospheric opacity (absorption) vs Wavelength of EM wavesPicture credits

    Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation on Humans

    1. Low-Frequency Radio waves (Wavelength > 3 km)

    Power stations produce low-frequency radio waves. If the magnetic field in the power lines is strong enough, these radio waves can produce small currents in the bodies of people standing directly under them. If the currents induced in the body are large enough, they can stimulate the nerves and muscles, and affect the biological processes. However, it is very rare.

    Dangers of electromagnetic radiation - Power lines

    Power lines

    The induced currents are generally not strong enough to heat the tissues in the body. Hence, they aren’t as harmful as other ionizing and non-ionizing waves.

    2. Radio and Microwaves

    Radio waves and microwaves, used for mobile communication and transmission of television and radio signals, can create thermal effects in our bodies. But this can only happen at high radiation levels, which does not occur by regular use of these devices. At regular usage levels, the dangers of electromagnetic radiation are negligible.

    Dangers of electromagnetic radiation - A cell phone tower

    A cell-phone tower

    Hence, radio waves and microwaves are harmless to the human body when they are under the recommended limits of radiation. Under normal daily use of mobile phones, TV and radio, these waves don’t possess sufficient energy to heat the exposed body parts. 

    People working on carrier decks in military aircraft have to wear suits that reflect microwaves to protect against radar systems. However, they are powerful radar systems, not normal mobile phones or Wi-Fi.

    Which body parts are the most affected, upon over-exposure?

    Your eyes and Testes are most affected upon over-exposure to radio and microwaves because these parts lack blood supply, which can dissipate the heat easily.

    Food for thought:

    Can radio waves and microwaves harm you, if you use mobile phones, televisions, radios and microwave ovens regularly?

    No, because, under normal usage, the waves emitted by these devices don’t possess sufficient energy to heat the exposed body parts. 

    Can using Bluetooth headphones harm your body more than your cell phones?

    No. On the contrary, using Bluetooth headphones is recommended. Bluetooth devices use higher wavelength radio waves that have lower energies. So, using Bluetooth headphones is less harmful than keeping the constantly-transmitting mobile phones near your ears (and your brain).

    Are the EM waves from a cell phone/radio/television transmission tower harmful for human beings?

    No. But, if you directly stand in front of the transmitting antennas on the tower for sufficient time, some of your tissues may get burned. These antennas send concentrated beams of radio waves/microwaves to satellites. So, they point directly to the satellites in the sky and not to the ground. In addition to that, the power density of the waves rapidly falls as one moves away from the antenna. Since these antennas are mounted on high towers, the power density of the waves on someone standing under such a tower is hundreds of times lesser than the recommended limits.

    Can radiation from cell phone towers affect birds and bees?

    The popular belief is that the radio waves and microwaves from cell-phone towers affect the navigational abilities of birds and bees. However, no convincing proof is available on the subject. 

    In 2018, Eklipse organized a web conference of experts to discuss the effects of electromagnetic radiation on wildlife. They analyzed 147 publications (research papers) on the subject and came to a conclusion.

    Most experts agreed that EM waves affect the navigational sense of birds and bees, and the metabolism of trees. However, they couldn’t find any convincing proof in the analyzed researches. The graphs below summarize the findings of the conference.

    What does it mean?

    Radio waves and microwaves emitted by cell-phone, television, and radio towers might have led to a decrease in bird and bee population. However, these waves might not be the only reason. It could have been one of the reasons. Other reasons could be pollution, lack of food, danger from other species, etc.

    Do radio waves and microwaves disrupt the magnetic sense of birds?

    The picture below shows the quality of evidence (Do credible and repeatable research data exist?) of a statement vs. the number of people who agreed for it.

    You will notice that the statement “Magnetic sense of birds are disrupted by RF” has been accepted by several experts. However, the results of the analyzed researches on that hypothesis are not credible enough; i.e., it cannot be proved.

    Harmful effects of electromagnetic waves on birds

    Harmful effects of Em waves on VertebratesRead more

    Can radio waves and microwaves affect the sense of orientation of Bees?

    The picture below shows the quality of evidence of a statement vs. the number of people who agreed for it.

    Several experts have accepted the statement “Detection of EMR by physiological orientation/movement mechanisms” (EM waves can make bees lose their sense of direction). However, the results of the analyzed researches on that hypothesis are not credible enough; i.e., it cannot be proved.

    Harmful effects of electromagnetic waves on bees

    Harmful effects of Em waves on Vertebrates Read more

    3. Infrared waves

    Greenhouse effect

    Infrared waves are the reason behind the Greenhouse effect, that rapidly heats our planet. The clouds and the earth’s surface reflect the sun’s waves as IR waves into the atmosphere. As a result, these waves leave the atmosphere into space.

    However, gases like Chlorofluorocarbons, water vapor, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen can trap the IR radiation in the atmosphere. These gases are released by human activity. So, as the human activityincreases, the concentration of these gases in the atmosphere increases. Therefore, more and more IR radiation gets trapped in the earth. Ultimately, this leads to global warming.

    Damage to eyes

    Prolonged exposure to IR waves can heat your eyes. As a result, you might get cataract, retinal burns and corneal ulcers.

    For example, workers who work in iron and glass production factories might suffer from Glassblower’s cataract. Glassblower’s cataract is the name given to changes that occur in the eyes of workers who look at glowing iron or glass without protective eye-wear every day.

    4. Visible light

    Damage to eyes

    Looking at extremely bright visible light can lead to retinal injury. Moreover, it could cause temporary or permanent blindness depending on the exposure.

    5. UV light

    Exposure to the higher wavelengths of UV light at limited amounts can be beneficial to health (formation of Vitamin D). But overexposure can lead to wrinkling of the skin, skin aging, skin burns, and skin cancer.

    Dangers of electromagnetic radiaion - A sunburn

    Sunburn on a woman’s back.By FAL101 at English Wikipedia – Own work by the original uploader, CC0, Link

    Are tanning beds or salons safe?

    Tanning beds use more concentrated UV light to produce a tan. Hence, they have the same chances of causing cancer as smoking. In addition to that, tan itself is dangerous because it is the response of your body against UV damage to your skin.

    UV rays in the lower part of the electromagnetic spectrum (wavelengths below UVA and UVB) are ionizing, i.e., they possess enough energy to strip the electrons from atoms and molecules, thereby ionizing them.

    6. X-rays

    Since X-rays are ionizing, they pose a health risk to humans. The use of X-rays for medical imaging might be widespread. But, every time you get an X-ray scan, your risk of getting cancer increases slightly. However, this risk depends on the part being scanned.

    X-ray of a person's hand while using a mouse

    X-ray of a person’s hand while using a mouse

    7. Gamma-rays

    Like X-rays, Gamma-rays are also ionizing, i.e., depending on the dosage, they may either damage the tissues and kill the body cells, or create cancer and genetic diseases.

    Symbol of nuclear radiation

    Gamma rays have no charge. So, they do not interact with matter and have higher penetration power.

    They can also pass through bones and teeth and carry very high energy. So, the health risks are even greater than that of X-rays.

    We hope that this blog post helped you understand the danger of electromagnetic radiation. If you liked this blog post, check out our other blog posts too:

    1. Different types of waves
    2. Properties of electromagnetic waves
    3. 7 types of electromagnetic waves
  • Properties Of Electromagnetic Waves & Behavior Of Light Waves

    Properties Of Electromagnetic Waves & Behavior Of Light Waves

    In this blog post, we will look at the properties of electromagnetic waves. Then, we will look at the behavior of light waves, which are electromagnetic waves too.

    From X-rays to radio waves to visible spectrum, electromagnetic waves are everywhere around us. Understanding their properties and behavior has helped humanity develop some incredible devices. Without these devices, our daily lives would be impossible.

    In this blog post, we look at some of these useful devices as well as some natural phenomena. We will do our best to help you understand the basics behind them. First, we will look at some of the properties of electromagnetic waves.

    Properties of electromagnetic waves

    1. Wavelength – The length of the wave,i.e., the distance between two consecutive maximum or minimum values of the wave.
    2. Frequency – The frequency is the number of waves (of one wavelength) that pass through a fixed point in unit time (one second).
    3. Amplitude – The maximum displacement of a particle from its original position.
    4. Phase – A particular point on the wave, designated as an angle between 0° and 360°. Phase difference is the displacement of one wave in comparison to another with the same frequency.
    5. Energy – The energy a wave carries is directly proportional to the square of its amplitude. The energy is also directly proportional to the frequency and inversely proportional to its wavelength.
    6. Intensity – Intensity is the amount of light at a particular wavelength.
    7. Color – The wavelength, at which the intensity of a wave is maximum, determines the color of the wave.

    Until now, we looked at the properties of electromagnetic waves. Now we will see how electromagnetic waves behave when they fall on a surface. For easy undersanding, we will consider light waves (from the visible spectrum), which are electromagnetic waves too. So, in the next section, we will look at the behavior of light waves.

    Behavior of light waves

    When electromagnetic waves encounter a new medium or move through a medium, they may exhibit one of the following behaviors. But we won’t look at these behaviors directly. Instead, we will look at some natural phenomena that occur in nature and man-made instruments. Then, we will try to understand the behavior of waves (mostly visible light) associated with that phenomenon.

    How can submarines see what is going on outside water?

    Clue: Due to reflection

    Reflection

    Reflection is the phenomenon due to which, a wave, that hits the interface between two mediums, returns to the same medium from where it hit the interface. In this phenomenon, the angle of incidence and the angle of reflection are always equal.

    Properties of electromagnetic waves - Reflection

    Image credits

    Example

    When you look at a mirror and see your reflection, it is because the mirror reflects the light waves.

    behavior of light waves

    Practical application

    A periscope uses the concept of reflection. Submarines use periscopes to see what is going on above the water while remaining submerged inside water.

    How do a microscope and a telescope differ from a projector?

    Hint: Due to Refraction

    Refraction

    Refraction is the phenomenon due to which, a wave, that hits the interface between two mediums, moves into the other medium with a change of direction, wavelength, and speed.

    Behavior of light waves - Refraction

    Image credits

    Example

    A prism refracts the light wave into different colors. Similarly, water droplets in the atmosphere refract the visible light (coming from the sun) creating a rainbow.

    Properties of electromagnetic waves - A prism refracting white light

    Optical prism refracting a ray of white light.

    Practical application

    Lenses work based on the principle of refraction. A lens refracts the light rays incident upon it. As a result, an image is produced on the other side of the lens, which is larger than the original object. 

    1. A convex lens causes the light rays that come from different parts of a distant object, to converge at a single point (your eye). Therefore, we use it to build objects like telescopes, binoculars, and microscopes.

    Properties of electromagnetic waves - a convex lens

    A convex lens refracting waves – Image credits

    Behavior of light waves - Image enlargement by a microscope

    Image enlargement by a microscope – Image credits

    Behavior of light waves - Image enlargement by a telescope

    Image enlargement by a telescope – Image credits

    2. A concave lens causes the light rays that come from different parts of a distant object, to diverge. Therefore, we use it in objects like projectors to create enlarged images.

    Properties of electromagnetic waves - a concave lens

    A concave lens refracting waves – Image credits

    What makes a beam of light passing through a small hole produce multiple concentric circles on the other side?

    Clue: Due to diffraction

    Diffraction

    When a wave hits an obstacle (or hole), it bends around the obstacle even though it stays in the same medium.  

    Example

    When a red laser beam passes through a circular hole, the resulting wave looks as shown in the picture below.

    Properties of electromagnetic waves - A circular hole diffracting red laser light

    By Wisky – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

    Practical application

    The principle of diffraction makes the construction of spectrometers possible. We use spectrometers to study the composition of stars as well as the composition of atoms and molecules.

    When you talk to a person wearing glasses, why can you (sometimes) not see your reflection on it?

    Clue: Due to interference

    Interference

    Interference is the phenomenon that happens when two waves come in contact with each other. Depending on the difference in their phases (time), the resulting wave might have a higher amplitude (constructive) or a lower amplitude (destructive). When a diffracted wave meets the original wave or another diffracted wave, it undergoes interference. Thus, Diffraction is often accompanied by interference.

    Behavior of light waves - A graphical illustration of interference

    Image credits

    Example

    One typical example of interference is the multiple colors you see on a soap bubble.

    Properties of electromagnetic waves - Color patterns on a soap bubble

    By Brocken Inaglory – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

    Some of the light waves that fall on the soap bubble get reflected by the upper layer (air-bubble interface). But some of the light waves are transmitted through the soap bubble. Then, a part of these light waves is reflected by the lower layer (bubble-air interface). These light waves reflected by two layers interfere with each other. Consequently, they cancel out some colors while brightening the others.

    Application

    Interference makes the creation anti-reflection coatings for lenses (used in sunglasses, telescopes, microscopes, solar panels, etc.) possible. By adjusting the thickness of the coating, some or all the wavelengths of light waves can be canceled out. This destructive interference prevents any reflection from happening. Anti-reflection coatings have two uses:

    1. Improve appearance by reducing reflection – useful in designing glasses. If you wear a spectacles with an anti-reflection coating, your friend needn’t look at his reflection while talking to you.

    Comparison of spectacles with and without anti-reflection coating

    Without vs With Antireflection coating – Image license

    2. Improve efficiency by reducing reflection and improving transmission – useful in solar panels. Solar panels are covered with glass that improves transmission. As a result, more solar light reaches the solar cells. Hence, more electricity is generated.

    What causes the glare that you see on the highway and the surface of a water-body?

    Clue: Due to polarization

    Polarization

    Polarization is a characteristic unique to transverse waves. In transverse waves, the direction of movement of particles is perpendicular to the direction of movement of the waves. If the direction of the motion of the waves is the X-axis, then these particles can move in any direction along the YZ plane.

    In a linearly polarized wave, the particles oscillate only in a fixed direction (fixed angle along the YZ plane). On the other hand, in an unpolarized wave, they oscillate in all directions (along the YZ plane). However, most sources of electromagnetic waves produce only unpolarized waves, consisting of waves with different polarizations. Therefore, a polarization filter is used to get linearly polarized waves from unpolarized waves.

    A linear polarizing filter at work

    Vertical linear polarization of an unpolarized wave – Image credits

    Example

    The glare you see on the highway while driving, and on a water-body on a sunny day are due to polarization. 

    The light produced by the sun, as well as most artificial light sources, is unpolarized. But the water-body and the highway act as horizontal linear polarization filters naturally, reflecting only the light waves parallel (horizontal) to the surface. When this light enters our eyes, it creates a powerful glare. As a result, it becomes difficult to see clearly under the surface of the water and on a highway.

    Application

    Polarized Sunglasses act as vertical polarization filters. So, they block the harmful glare, which consists of light waves of horizontal polarization. Thus, a person wearing a polarized sunglass can see clearly under the surface of the water and also on a highway.

    An example of polarization

    Image credits

    How to find out if your sunglasses are polarized?

    While wearing your sunglass, slowly tilt your head while looking at a reflective surface. Your head must be perpendicular (at 90°) to your body. Now, if your sunglasses are polarized, the glare should brighten.

    Why can you see through a glass door, but not a wooden door?

    Clue: Due to absorption

    Absorption & Attenuation

    When waves pass through a medium (solid, liquid, or gas), they transfer their energy to the molecules in the medium (or the medium absorbs the energy), making the molecules vibrate. This phenomenon is called absorption.

    As a result, as a wave moves through a medium, it steadily loses energy. Since the energy of a wave is proportional to the square of its amplitude, its amplitude falls as well. This steady loss of amplitude or energy of a wave as it travels through a medium is called attenuation.

    Example

    A medium is considered transparent (to that wave) if only a fraction of the wave’s energy is lost as the wave travels through it. On the other hand, it is considered opaque if all the energy of the wave is lost.

    A glass door is transparent to visible light since it absorbs only a part of the energy of the visible light. Hence, you can see through the glass door. However, a wooden door absorbs all the energy of the visible light. Therefore, it is opaque to visible light (but not to some other radiation).

    Application

    Different tissues in our body absorb X-rays to different extents. This concept forms the basis of the functioning of an X-ray machine.

    We hope that this blog post helped you understand the properties of electromagnetic waves and the behavior of light waves. If you liked this blog post, you will like the following blog posts too:

    1. Different types of Waves
    2. 7 types of electromagnetic waves